UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO                                                                                                  Winter 2004

FACULTY OF SOCIAL WORK                                                                      Professor Rob MacFadden
                                                                                                                             robert.macfadden@utoronto.ca
                                                                                                                             (416) 978-5818; Room 434
                                                                                                                             www.robertmacfadden.com
 

 

ADVANCED SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH

SWK 4503S

 

 A SINGLE SYSTEM APPROACH TO MEASURING
PRACTICE EFFECTIVENESS

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION

 

 

RATIONALE AND SIGNIFICANCE

 

Social workers are increasingly required to demonstrate the effectiveness of their work and the movement towards evidence-based practice involves the use of data-based, empirical evidence whenever possible. This course enables students to address the question, “Is my practice effective?”  from a single system perspective.  The single system approach to practice evaluation is client-centred and naturalistic to the practice context. It is one of the few types of research methods that can be directly employed by a practitioner and where the results can be immediately shared with clients and used to refine the intervention. A single system approach can be applied to micro, mezzo or macro levels of practice.

 

 

EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY

 

This course is based on an adult-centred model of learning. Students are expected to attend class and participate fully in class discussions and to share their own knowledge and experience as a critical part of the class process. Integrating research and theory with practice will be a primary focus throughout the course and students will be encouraged, at all times, to connect this learning with their experiences within their practica.

 

 

 

 

 

GOALS

 

To provide students with an opportunity to learn the essentials of a single system approach to practice and how this perspective can strengthen their work with clients. The course will emphasize how this approach can be integrated naturalistically into practice and how it can respect the diversity and self-determination of clients while providing systematic feedback to both clients and social workers about desired change.

 

 

STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

 

This course will enable students to develop:

 

            · a knowledge of a single systems approach to research,

 

            · an understanding of how the single systems approach can be used to evaluate practice including an appreciation of the strengths and limitations of this  approach,

 

            · an appreciation of how this approach can be employed to incorporate both

            diversity and ethical concerns,

 

· a proposal which focuses on the  evaluation of some facet of the student's practice, using a single system methodology,

 

· an understanding and experience in using a range of  measures, computer technology and the internet in developing the assignment.

 

 

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

 

Every effort will be made to create a positive learning environment where people are free to share ideas and explore issues. Learning from others is a significant part of the educational process both within our classes and in the field. Social workers, in particular, have a social and professional responsibility to respect and encourage a range of viewpoints. We may challenge the ideas but not the person. Students are encouraged throughout the course to make suggestions of ways to foster a more positive learning environment within the classroom.

 

 

 

 

WEEKLY CONTENT & READINGS

 

January 6       Introductions, review of course outline, bibliography & assignment

                        Overview of single system evaluation

 

January  13    Fundamentals of single system evaluation & comparison with other

            research methods. Bloom et al., Prologue (1-31); Part I, (33-54). See

            http://www.robertmacfadden.com/single/sld001.htm .

 

January 20     Developing client goals: From the general to specific. Bloom et al.,

                        Chapter 3, 86-115.

 

January 27     Measurement & recording plans. Bloom et al., Chapter 2 (57-85);

                        Chapter 4, (116-138).

 

February  3    Behavioural observation & individualized rating scales. Bloom et al.,

                        Chapter 5, (163-193); Chapter 6, (194-210).

 

February 10   Standardized questionnaires & client logs & reactivity. Bloom et al.,

                        Chapter 7, (211- 266); Chapter 8, (277-295). Chapter 9, (296-311).

 

February 17   Reading Week

 

February 24   Single system designs: Basic principles, & baselining,  Bloom et al.,

                        Chapter 11, (327-363). Chapter 12, (364-379).

 

March 2          Types of designs: Case study, basic, experimental, multiple & design

                        selection. Chapter 13, (380- 399). Chapter 14, (400-427); Chapter 15

                        (428-457). Chapter 18, (496-512).

 

March 9          Analysis: Basic principles & visual analysis. Chapter 19, (515-553);

                        Chapter 20, (554-568).

 

March 16        Descriptive statistics, statistical significance & computer analysis.

                        Chapter 21, (569-594); Chapter 22, (595-613); Chapter 23, (614-645).

 

March 23        Ethics. Chapter 25, (659-688).

 

March 30        Diversity-sensitive evaluation. Rodgers, A., Potocky, M. (1997).

                        Evaluating culturally sensitive practice through single system design:

                        Methodological issues and strategies. Research on Social Work Practice.

                        Vol.7, No.3, July, 391-401. Available through e-journals.

                       

                        Nelsen, J. (1994). Ethics, gender and ethnicity in single-case research

                        and evaluation. Journal of Social Service Research. Vol.18(3/4), 139-152.

 

April 6             Last class. Assignment Due
 

                        Using single system evaluation in practice: Some examples

 

                        Using single system designs in practice. Kazi, M., Mantysaari, M.,

                        Rostila, I. (1997). Research on Social Work Practice. Vol.7, No.3, July,

                        311-328. Available through e-journals.

 

                        Besa, D. (1994). Evaluating narrative family therapy using single

                        system research designs. Research on Social Work Practice. Vol.4, No.3,

                        309-325.

 

                        Jensen, C. (1994). Psychosocial treatment of depression in women: Nine

                        single-subject evaluations. Research on Social Work Practice. Vol.4,

                        No.3, July, 267-282.

 

 
 

COURSE FORMAT

 

Weekly classes will focus on exploring the basics of the single system approach and content will be presented in both lecture and discussion formats and include some PowerPoint presentations. Students are encouraged to apply their past and current field experiences to understand the single system approach.  

 

Examples from practice will be provided and students will be encouraged to bring in their own examples and to share their learnings with the class. Research-based content will be emphasized and students will be asked to explore the university’s e-journals for relevant articles.

 

Internet resources will be used throughout, along with specialized, single system software for analysis.

 

 

 

EVALUATION OF STUDENTS

 

 

ASSIGNMENT

 

There is one assignment which is a 25 page, double-spaced proposal for the evaluation of some aspect of your practice with a client system at any level (i.e., micro, mezzo, macro), using a single systems approach. This should include:

 

            · the nature and significance of the problem and related goals to be achieved

 

            with a client system,

 

· how your client system will be involved in this evaluation,

 

            · a brief literature review related to the problem and goals,

 

            · a conceptual framework with a hypothesis,

 

· the essential characteristics of a single system approach to evaluation and why this is appropriate to use in this situation,

 

· the type of single system design that will be used, along with the data collection plan, the measures, approach to analysis and how the results are presented and shared with the client,

 

· how your evaluation addresses issues related to the client’s diversity,

 

· how your evaluation addresses ethical issues, including informed consent,

 

· the limitations, from a research perspective, of your approach to evaluation, identifying any barriers (e.g., client, professional, organizational and personal) to conducting the evaluation,

 

            · suggestions as to how your evaluation might be improved given different

            circumstances.

 
 

This assignment will be given a letter grade and is subject to the requirements of all graduate papers, including correct spelling, grammar and bibliography. Late papers are subject to a one-half grade penalty. Please consult our MSW Studies handbook http://www.utoronto.ca/facsocwk/mswprogram/handpub/table.html  for details regarding paper writing, grades, policies and evaluation. The School of Graduate Studies Calendar and website also contains useful information.  This assignment is due Tuesday, April 6th, 2004.

 

 

REQUIRED TEXT

 

Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. (2003). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable

professional (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.  Available at Bob Miller Bookroom.   

Singleout04a.htm